|
Washington
Drug Court Research
|
|
Drug Courts were introduced in 1989 by Janet Reno. Four
years before she was appointed U.S. attorney general, Reno was a prosecutor in
Dade County, Florida. Home of the Miami Dolphins and a long history of drug
dealing and abuse. The new Drug Court program offered treatment as an
alternative to jail time.
In 1994, Pierce County began operation of the first adult
Drug Court in Washington. Three years later, Clallam county opened
Washington’s first Drug Court to serve youth. This diversionary treatment
program is intended to save money by keeping offenders from re-entering the
system and committing new offenses.
By 2000, Washington had fourteen adult Drug Courts, three
Juvenile Drug Courts, and four Drug Courts in the planning stage within twelve
counties. Some counties have more than one Drug Court and a few Drug Courts are
operating in Native American courts.
To ensure that Drug Courts are both reducing addictive
criminal behavior and cost effective, the University of Washington Alcohol and
Drug Abuse Institute began an evaluation in January of 1999.
The first quantitative reports on King, Pierce, and Spokane courts were
produced in January 2000 and the first reports covering Thurston, Skagit, and
Kitsap in July 2000. Additional counties and more extensive analyses are planned
for 2001. Early evaluation indicates Drug Courts are succeeding, however, the
greatest challenge facing Washington Drug Courts is securing adequate operating
funds.
In the beginning, Washington Drug Courts start with federal
funding. Typically, a federal grant is renewed for three years. Once the federal
grant ends the county in which the Drug Court is operating must provide funding.
However, there is such a large population in need of treatment that larger
counties like King, Spokane, and Tacoma struggle to provide enough funds to
adequately operate their Drug Courts.
For continued success, Washington Drug Courts
need additional financial support from the Washington State Legislature as well
as local counties and continued collaboration with local treatment and service
organizations.
|