|
American Cancer Society
Statement on the Use of Heroin
and Marijuana
for Relieving the Pain and Discomfort
Suffered by Some Cancer Patients
Document 006286
Pain is a major health problem in this country; especially
the kind of pain that is sometimes encountered in patients with cancer. According to the
experts, the treatment of pain and accompanying symptoms (i.e. fear, anxiety, depression,
weakness, nausea, and vomiting) needs to be considerably improved. This is in spite of the
fact that there are agents and techniques presently available that can provide relief for
the majority of those patients; however, none of these approaches is without its
shortcomings and there is always a need for improvement.
The American Cancer Society wishes to go on record as
supporting the research of any agent or technique for which there may be evidence of a
therapeutic advantage, including some currently restricted agents such as heroin, cocaine,
marijuana, etc. The American Cancer Society also supports the continuing education of
health professionals in more effective use of what is currently available. Two studies
supported by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Drug Abuse
compared the analgesic effects of heroin and morphine in cancer patients. The
investigators reached a conclusion that, although heroin is a potent pain reliever, it is
no more effective than morphine. Also, the side effects of the two drugs were found to be
similar. Drugs currently available are powerful enough to treat the majority of patients
with severe, long-term pain.
The drugs used most commonly are morphine and meperidine
hydrochloride. In addition, the FDA has approved dilaudid-HP (hydromorphone), a medication
that is more potent than heroin. A few scientific reports evaluating the use of marijuana,
or THC, its active ingredient, in diminishing nausea and vomiting secondary to
chemotherapy have noted some advantages of the substance over conventional medications. As
a result, legislation permitting the use of marijuana in cancer treatment on a
prescription basis has been proposed in some states. At the present time, the society
does not believe that the results of clinical investigation are sufficient to warrant
legislation decontrolling marijuana or its active ingredient for medical use.
|
|